
Does anyone know what mods are needed in order to achieve 7600 rpm's?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NFAC4rWhwc
Offline









boostadic has a standalone and fully built motor. that's how he achieved it. but... i think he only does 7000-7200 rpm normally.

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline

Michael





i bet you could get to 7600 with just a raised redline...... once
Online

Don



I'm revving to 6800 on stock internals besides cams and I'd be afraid to go any higher than that. PLUS, it wouldn't be making any power up there anyway.
Online

Tony







Jaytucc77 wrote:
Does anyone know what mods are needed in order to achieve 7600 rpm's?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NFAC4rWhwc
- 07 crank
- custom cams
- custom valve springs
Online

Jamil


^^ and aftermarket rods
Offline

Tony







donspecv02 wrote:
I'm revving to 6800 on stock internals besides cams and I'd be afraid to go any higher than that. PLUS, it wouldn't be making any power up there anyway.
Correct, not without stupidly aggressive cams and custom valve springs...
Online

Michael





need special pistons too... otherwise youd beat the shit outta the cylinder walls. says rtr
Online

Tony







darsondriss wrote:
need special pistons too... otherwise youd beat the shit outta the cylinder walls. says rtr
In other words it aint worth it... 6800rpm redline is enough...
Online

Jamil


pimpsmurf wrote:
That probably is only 7200rpms or so. The stock tach is seriously off most of the time. I show 6600rpms with a 6200rpm redline, and it's definately only 6200rpms.
I 100% agree, my car is a prime example. Redline is 7k but shows almost 7500k look http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAkKysjuyV0
Offline

Don



Yeah. 7500+ is seriously fast piston speeds with this long stroke motor. I wouldn't even think about it on stock internals.
Online

Tony







donspecv02 wrote:
Yeah. 7500+ is seriously fast piston speeds with this long stroke motor. I wouldn't even think about it on stock internals.
You could also get a few mm longer rods, to get the piston speed down a bit...
Online

Tony







pimpsmurf wrote:
Black04SpecV wrote:
darsondriss wrote:
need special pistons too... otherwise youd beat the shit outta the cylinder walls. says rtr
In other words it aint worth it... 6800rpm redline is enough...
Nah. I plan to build a 10k+ rpm QR with a custom crank in the next 10 years. hahaha
F1 cars make loads of power with extremely high redlines because of very low strokes. I won't be going that far obviously, but I think a 80-90mm stroke is going to be ideal with a custom intake and turbo setup. Should make sweet ass power.
-JNY
I should have added, unless you have shitload of money to sink into custom engine with custom internals...
Online

Tony







pimpsmurf wrote:
Black04SpecV wrote:
pimpsmurf wrote:
Nah. I plan to build a 10k+ rpm QR with a custom crank in the next 10 years. hahaha
F1 cars make loads of power with extremely high redlines because of very low strokes. I won't be going that far obviously, but I think a 80-90mm stroke is going to be ideal with a custom intake and turbo setup. Should make sweet ass power.
-JNYI should have added, unless you have shitload of money to sink into custom engine with custom internals...
Most people with these engines just don't want to go that far.
-JNY
I would have LOVED to built this engine, BUT I lack funds to do it.
Most people who would like to built this engine lack the funds...
Hell I have the knowledge to built a QR25 engine capable of revving to 7-7.2k rpm and making 500+ whp... I just don't have the money to do it...
Online

Don



Black04SpecV wrote:
pimpsmurf wrote:
Black04SpecV wrote:
I should have added, unless you have shitload of money to sink into custom engine with custom internals...Most people with these engines just don't want to go that far.
-JNYI would have LOVED to built this engine, BUT I lack funds to do it.
Most people who would like to built this engine lack the funds...
Hell I have the knowledge to built a QR25 engine capable of revving to 7-7.2k rpm and making 500+ whp... I just don't have the money to do it...
The options are cheaper than you think.....
Online

Tony







donspecv02 wrote:
Black04SpecV wrote:
pimpsmurf wrote:
Most people with these engines just don't want to go that far.
-JNYI would have LOVED to built this engine, BUT I lack funds to do it.
Most people who would like to built this engine lack the funds...
Hell I have the knowledge to built a QR25 engine capable of revving to 7-7.2k rpm and making 500+ whp... I just don't have the money to do it...The options are cheaper than you think.....
Well I can't even afford a 3" catback...lol
Online

Don



I'm also gonna add here that a good, USABLE powerband is more important than peak numbers. Finding a good balance is important with any engine.
Online

Tony







donspecv02 wrote:
I'm also gonna add here that a good, USABLE powerband is more important than peak numbers. Finding a good balance is important with any engine.
+1
To make power all the way to 7500rpm redline you will need stupidly aggresive cams, which will make the low end suck balls...
Online

Kevin





Im aiming for 8000-8500rpm redline. This will be my winter build for next spring so give me a few more months, Ill be there. 


Offline

Paul

What is IVT? I havnt heard that term before.
Offline

Jamil


ignition valve timing, i'm guessing.
Offline

Paul

oh. ok. thanks.
Offline

ror




stock tachometers are off, mins always showing 6500 when i redline, and i even once in a mis proper shift got it to show 7k LOL though i think it was really 6500-6700

Online

Tony







pimpsmurf wrote:
Black04SpecV wrote:
donspecv02 wrote:
I'm also gonna add here that a good, USABLE powerband is more important than peak numbers. Finding a good balance is important with any engine.
+1
To make power all the way to 7500rpm redline you will need stupidly aggresive cams, which will make the low end suck balls...Not true. IVT does a lot for us in this regard, preventing idle/low speed overlap, reversion, and poor torque. When electronicly controlled cams (vtec, i-vtec, IVT, VVEL especially), comes into play, it changes the rules of top end, and bottom end cams. That is why the technology was invented in the first place, and VVEL is going to open up doors we can only imagine (a reflash with 20-40whp gains depending on mods??? I'll take it.)
-JNY
So how do you explain that donspecv02 lost a LOT of low end torque, when he dynoed with the BC stage 3 cams?
Online

Don



Black04SpecV wrote:
pimpsmurf wrote:
Black04SpecV wrote:
+1
To make power all the way to 7500rpm redline you will need stupidly aggresive cams, which will make the low end suck balls...Not true. IVT does a lot for us in this regard, preventing idle/low speed overlap, reversion, and poor torque. When electronicly controlled cams (vtec, i-vtec, IVT, VVEL especially), comes into play, it changes the rules of top end, and bottom end cams. That is why the technology was invented in the first place, and VVEL is going to open up doors we can only imagine (a reflash with 20-40whp gains depending on mods??? I'll take it.)
-JNYSo how do you explain that donspecv02 lost a LOT of low end torque, when he dynoed with the BC stage 3 cams?
I think it was because the exhaust cam is too big.
Online