safc is a piggy back, best cheap way to go about a tune

safcII because the only piggyback available is the stillen. it just doesn't make sense to assume that you will have the best tune, supporting all mods of varying degrees in a piggyback. instead, with a safc you can continually tune your car to optimize different mods.

sorry i shoulda specified im talkin AEM, Greddy, ect

im personally going to be using an safc 2 to tune with when i install my turbo just because you can tune for each mod

02SERious wrote:

safc is great, its cost effective and works well... there just aren't as many tuning points. it you want something better i've heard good things about the greddy.

in all reality, you don't need many tuning points, interpolation takes care of if. for example, if you have a a range, 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 rpm, and you have to take out 5% out of 2000-6000 rpm range, you can very easily do that with 2 tuning points instead of 5, because interpolation will take care of everything 2000 - 6000, and it's a lot more of a pain in the ass to change the tune when you have to change all the rpm points you're tuning.

now, LOAD points is something to be considered, safc has two load points, which results in 3 distinctive tuning maps: LOW and HIGH load point, so you get everything below the LOW point going to absolute LOW point setting, between LOW and HIGH, which is a blend, and above HIGH, which is absolute HIGH point setting.

gurov wrote:

02SERious wrote:

safc is great, its cost effective and works well... there just aren't as many tuning points. it you want something better i've heard good things about the greddy.

in all reality, you don't need many tuning points, interpolation takes care of if. for example, if you have a a range, 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 rpm, and you have to take out 5% out of 2000-6000 rpm range, you can very easily do that with 2 tuning points instead of 5, because interpolation will take care of everything 2000 - 6000, and it's a lot more of a pain in the ass to change the tune when you have to change all the rpm points you're tuning.

now, LOAD points is something to be considered, safc has two load points, which results in 3 distinctive tuning maps: LOW and HIGH load point, so you get everything below the LOW point going to absolute LOW point setting, between LOW and HIGH, which is a blend, and above HIGH, which is absolute HIGH point setting.

does the safc make a good tune on a N/A?