
Tony






I have a feeling that my stock fuel pump is failing. Even with 0 corrections on the AEM FI/C the AFR's during WOT are lean at certain spots.
Look at the AEM log graph.
Red = engine RPM, I floored it at 2.2k rpm until redline.
Blue = engine Load, PSIA (Pound per square inch absolute)
Green = AFR
Top Green dotted line = 11.9 AFR
Bottom Green dotted line = 11.0 AFR
As far as I know with 0 corrections after I floor it it should run pig rich with AFR's in 10's, not with AFR's around 12... Thats how it was with SAFC-II. With SAFC-II at 6psi of boost I was taking out -25 fuel to achieve 11.6 AFR at redline...
See the graph below and give me some input. The graph is a log with 0 corrections on the FI/C. If I start take out fuel with the FI/C the car would run lean as hell, even with minor corrections (-2, -3) the AFR's would jump to 12.5 - 13, etc...
Few things about the car... 440 injectors, stock fuel pump, 5psi wg spring, AEM TRU-BOOST turned OFF, fresh tank of Shell 92 gas...
I am almost certain that it is a fuel delivery issue, but before I buy Walbro 190lph I want your input...
Please help me out!!
Last edited by Black04SpecV (2008-09-28 22:24:52)
Online

Tony






Big J wrote:
fuel pump issues will go lean in teh upper rev ranges most of the time, when the car needs the most fuel. I added in corrections at idle ANd instead of subtracting -30 at redline, it's down to maybe -7
So what do you think is my problem? Why is it running lean with 0 corrections?
Online

Tony






Big J wrote:
you might need to add corrections. W/ tuning at idle I have to add fuel 3000-3400
Why would that be? With SAFC-II you take out fuel and with FI/C you add? That just doesnt make sense to me???
Online

Tony






Big J wrote:
do you have another wideband you can check against?
No only the UEGO...
My UEGO is in the third spot on the Treadstone downpipe. Do you think its too close to the turbo and could have fucked up readings/wideband going bad?
Online

Travis a.k.a TRAV



I believe the ECM does some type of "LEARNING" to this shit as you go along. I used to be at -20 to -30 corrections on my Neo as well. Now I have my idle set at like -20 or -25, but I'm at -5 corrections the rest of the way up and my AFR's are at steady 11's, and sometimes jumping up to the low 12's. I don't know why every1 freaks out when they see a high 11 or low 12 AFR. I don't really worry until I see a 13 at WOT in boost. I believe the closer you can come to 0 corrections the better. I THINK the humidity we have experienced here this summer has had alot to do with having to add fuel in order to achieve a safe AFR.
I've been running afr's in the high 11's to low 12 for over a year now and 15k miles. I have run anywhere from 6.5 to 10psi of boost during this period of time. I haven't heard any audible detonation during this time either.
Last edited by 05SpecVnBlack (2008-09-28 12:27:15)

Offline

Tony






05SpecVnBlack wrote:
I believe the ECM does some type of "LEARNING" to this shit as you go along. I used to be at -20 to -30 corrections on my Neo as well. Now I have my idle set at like -20 or -25, but I'm at -5 corrections the rest of the way up and my AFR's are at steady 11's, and sometimes jumping up to the low 12's. I don't know why every1 freaks out when they see a high 11 or low 12 AFR. I don't really worry until I see a 13 at WOT in boost. I believe the closer you can come to 0 corrections the better. I THINK the humidity we have experienced here this summer has had alot to do with having to add fuel in order to achieve a safe AFR.
I've been running afr's in the high 11's to low 12 for over a year now and 15k miles. I have run anywhere from 6.5 to 10psi of boost during this period of time. I haven't heard any audible detonation during this time either.
The ECU learns over a period of time (few days). I have pin 121 cut so the ECU resets every time I shut the car off...
Online

Tony







Anybody has ANY ideas?
Online

Tony







Online

Tony







Would it be a good idea to unplug the 1st o2 sensor and see what it does?
I am out of ideas, I just have this feeling that something is wrong with her 
Online

Josh




If you unplug the 1st 02 sensor, it will go into a default open loop mode all the time. You will have to tune, idle, cruize, part throttle, wot, etc...lot more work, but gives you control of everything without ?tune drift.. it will give you an ses light though obviously. SO your car is going lean under WOT at higher rpms? did I read this right?
Lifes to short to drive a shitty car, get in a Spec V-T
\Offline

Tony






silverspec wrote:
If you unplug the 1st 02 sensor, it will go into a default open loop mode all the time. You will have to tune, idle, cruize, part throttle, wot, etc...lot more work, but gives you control of everything without ?tune drift.. it will give you an ses light though obviously. SO your car is going lean under WOT at higher rpms? did I read this right?
I do not think I have any tune drift... My pin 121 is cut so the ECU resets itself every time I shut off the car... For the ECU to learn it needs at least few days of data.
I do not care about SES light... No emission check for me plus I ripped the SES bulb out of the gauge cluster...
Yeah look at the graph in the first post... That's me flooring the car from 2.2k rpm all the way to redline... It spikes from 12.9 to 11.0 at WOT with NO corrections what so ever... The second green dotted line in the graph is 11.9...
When I had SAFC-II, I had to subtract quite a lot of fuel to get 11.9 throughout the powerband at WOT...
I do not know what to think about it BigJ thinks I should trust my wideband and add fuel on the FI/C...
Last edited by Black04SpecV (2008-09-28 21:29:53)
Online

Josh




Well, an untuned car is an untuned car. If you had the safc and now the aem fic, it shouldnt really have changed. If you were running rich before and has to pull fuel on the safc, then it should be the same with the fic. Why would it change? Thats my thoughts. Just because you installed the fic shouldnt have made it that you need to add fuel now, when before you were pulling fuel off the stock fuel map. Have you changed anything else on the fic or is it completely off the stock ecu like a safc would be with no corrections? No timing changes or anything?
Lifes to short to drive a shitty car, get in a Spec V-T
\Offline

Armando Miro


You have to remember that the FI/C controls the fuel in a total different way than the way the afc does. Remember that the AFC fools the ECU based on the readings from the maf and the FI/C is actually controlling the injectors by itself independently from the MAF readings. It looks like the only thing that you need is a tune.
Last edited by armandotech (2008-09-28 21:36:31)
Offline

Tony






silverspec wrote:
Well, an untuned car is an untuned car. If you had the safc and now the aem fic, it shouldnt really have changed. If you were running rich before and has to pull fuel on the safc, then it should be the same with the fic. Why would it change? Thats my thoughts. Just because you installed the fic shouldnt have made it that you need to add fuel now, when before you were pulling fuel off the stock fuel map. Have you changed anything else on the fic or is it completely off the stock ecu like a safc would be with no corrections? No timing changes or anything?
Thats EXACTLY what I'm thinking... I haven't changed anything on the FI/C, no timing cahnges, nothing...
Online

Tony






armandotech wrote:
You have to remember that the FI/C controls the fuel in a total different way than the way the afc does. Remember that the AFC fools the ECU based on the readings from the maf and the FI/C is actually controlling the injectors by itself independently from the MAF readings. It looks like the only thing that you need is a tune.
I know how the FI/C controls fuel, I have installed it myself. I KNOW it intercepts the fuel injector signal...
My point being is with 0 corrections on the MAP based fuel map the car should run the same as a car with a SAFC-II with 0 corrections and that is pig rich...
Online

gennady gurov







you've got to plug into your ecu and see what your long term fuel trims are, that's what's going to correct fuel for you

Online

Tony






gurov wrote:
you've got to plug into your ecu and see what your long term fuel trims are, that's what's going to correct fuel for you
What would I use to plug into the ECU?
Online

Tony






gurov wrote:
you've got to plug into your ecu and see what your long term fuel trims are, that's what's going to correct fuel for you
Besides wouldn't the long term fuel trims reset every time I shut the car off with the pin 121 cut??
Online

Kurt Kennedy



what are the fuel trims?
Online

Tony






kc03spec-v wrote:
what are the fuel trims?
good question... how do I find out?
Kurt, you are the only one who has some experience with the FI/C, please help me shed some light on this... I really dont understand what is going on...
Last edited by Black04SpecV (2008-09-29 01:33:07)
Online




I kind of have to agree with armandotech up there. But your theory also makes alot of sense.
Do you have a friend with a wideband that can lend you the sensor for a bit? Maybe its starting to take a dump on you.
Offline

Armando Miro


If it was me I wouldn't even bother with theories and all that BS I would just go ahead and tune the car and see what it does.
Offline

Michael




armandotech wrote:
If it was me I wouldn't even bother with theories and all that BS I would just go ahead and tune the car and see what it does.
I disagree; but I'm not an expert by any means.
I'm having a very similar problem. From what I've read in this thread Black04SpecV had an SAFCII and if he had 0 for all of his corrections he was running very rich. In other words, the SAFC wasn't doing jack (0 corrections) and the ECU alone was making the car run rich. He swapped out the SAFC for an F/IC. Even though they manipulate the fuel trim through different methods a 0 correction on each will yield the same results; 100% ECU and the car should still run just as rich as when the SAFC was hooked up. That is what SHOULD be happening right now but it isn't.
With that in mind, tuning the car with the F/IC isn't going to do anything but mask the real problem; whatever that may be.
My advice is to log your fuel pressure at idle and at WOT, and try to do this over the course of a few days or so. That should help to narrow down the list of suspects. I'm going to do the same as soon as I have the equipment.
Offline

Tony






mjeffries wrote:
armandotech wrote:
If it was me I wouldn't even bother with theories and all that BS I would just go ahead and tune the car and see what it does.
I disagree; but I'm not an expert by any means.
I'm having a very similar problem. From what I've read in this thread Black04SpecV had an SAFCII and if he had 0 for all of his corrections he was running very rich. In other words, the SAFC wasn't doing jack (0 corrections) and the ECU alone was making the car run rich. He swapped out the SAFC for an F/IC. Even though they manipulate the fuel trim through different methods a 0 correction on each will yield the same results; 100% ECU and the car should still run just as rich as when the SAFC was hooked up. That is what SHOULD be happening right now but it isn't.
With that in mind, tuning the car with the F/IC isn't going to do anything but mask the real problem; whatever that may be.
My advice is to log your fuel pressure at idle and at WOT, and try to do this over the course of a few days or so. That should help to narrow down the list of suspects. I'm going to do the same as soon as I have the equipment.
I found out what my REAL problem is... It is the motherfucking piece of shit self learning specV ECU... Today I took the car to the gym after it sat for a good 24 hours and I had nice 10.0 AFR at WOT after the turbo spooled. Mind that my ECU pin 121 is cut so the ECU resets its fuel trims after a certain period of time after I shut the car off... Same thing as unplugging the battery overnight.
What I'm getting to is that the specV ECU makes adjustments to its fuel trims, than I make adjustments with the FI/C throwing everything out of whack.
My next step is to unplug both o2 sensors and tune it only with the FI/C...
IMHO for boosted SpecV to be tuned properly the ECU has to be out of the loop completely.
The best solution for boosted specv's is the megasquirt with external trigger wheel so you can control ignition and fuel completely without the specV ECU...
Last edited by Black04SpecV (2008-09-29 13:28:32)
Online

Tony






Big J wrote:
understanding how the ECU works is the key to tuning it with a piggyback.
Screw piggybacks. I'll be going with Megasquirt that should take care of all the tuning problems and make tuning a breeze 
Online

Travis a.k.a TRAV



I agree with J, and I don't see what all the fuss is about. I think alot of ppl have alot of trouble because they screw with their car too much. So what the tune drifts a little. As long as you have a wideband and keep an eye on your afr's, there isn't any reason why you can't make adjustments yourself. I believe that resetting your ECU everyday or whatever is what is causing you problems. Your car shouldn't run PIG RICH with 0 corrections as long as your giving the ECU the opportunity to make changes on it's own. Like I said my corrections are at -5 ALL THE WAY ACROSS THE BOARD, and my car does not run extremely rich. I don't think another +5 amount of correction is gonna make that big of a difference. I only have one of my cars original 02 sensors plugged up.

Offline

Tony






05SpecVnBlack wrote:
I agree with J, and I don't see what all the fuss is about. I think alot of ppl have alot of trouble because they screw with their car too much. So what the tune drifts a little. As long as you have a wideband and keep an eye on your afr's, there isn't any reason why you can't make adjustments yourself. I believe that resetting your ECU everyday or whatever is what is causing you problems. Your car shouldn't run PIG RICH with 0 corrections as long as your giving the ECU the opportunity to make changes on it's own. Like I said my corrections are at -5 ALL THE WAY ACROSS THE BOARD, and my car does not run extremely rich. I don't think another +5 amount of correction is gonna make that big of a difference. I only have one of my cars original 02 sensors plugged up.
Thats exactly what I dont want to do... I don't want to keep an eye on my AFR's all the time. I want to have a tune which will not drift.
Plus the Megasquirt is a full fuel Standalone. There are no injector wires going from ECU to Megasquirt or from ECU to the injectors while using Megasquirt. There are only wires going from Megasquirt to the Injectors. Plus the Megasquirt can control boost, has launch control, can raise the redline, etc... Way better than the FI/C can ever be.
Online




you still have to tune the megasquirt. And if you want all those nice extras you named, be ready to spend quite a bit if time getting it all worked out and running how you want it..megasquirt isnt plug n play
Offline

Tony






White_Spec-V wrote:
you still have to tune the megasquirt. And if you want all those nice extras you named, be ready to spend quite a bit if time getting it all worked out and running how you want it..megasquirt isnt plug n play
It WILL be easier to tune than the FI/C 
Besides the megasquirt is a FULL fuel standalone, so I will never have to worry about the stock piece of shit ECU messing up my tune and causing a tune drift...
Last edited by Black04SpecV (2008-09-29 20:46:50)
Online




I know that the megasquirt is a fuel management system. But you will have to tune every aspect of it. I've looked into the ms and will be getting it after I am turdbowed.
I was just stating that it will not be a quick tune. You will be tuning for everyday driving also. Not just wot. But maybe you'll get lucky and someone on here will send you what they have for their fuel trims to save you some time.
Offline




...just for reference, the ecu is actually very good. Not a pos like many believe it to be.
Offline

Rick




Big J with ur knowledge of the QRs ECU
What do u think is the best way to tune with neo/safc (open loop) or (closed loop)!! Please explain!!
Offline

Aaron



Big J wrote:
I don't explain this because most people don't get it. I had to stare at datalogs for hours and play and play and play to figure it out.
would please with a cherry ontop help? 
Offline

Tony






Big J wrote:
White_Spec-V wrote:
...just for reference, the ecu is actually very good. Not a pos like many believe it to be.
+1
Sure might be, hell I don't know much about the stock ECU. What I know is that I cannot tune it or alter fuel maps on it, so it doesn't work for me...
Online

Tony






White_Spec-V wrote:
you still have to tune the megasquirt. And if you want all those nice extras you named, be ready to spend quite a bit if time getting it all worked out and running how you want it..megasquirt isnt plug n play
No problem... I have the time plus more people here are running megasquirt, so I'll be able to get help from them...
Online




in that case, good luck! 
Offline

Rick




Big J
If u explain these tuning techniques it in simple terms I thing a lot of people in this forum would benefit by of course ur genius!! & hard work!! remember all good deeds never go unnoticed its called Gooood Karma!! Well then lets begin!!
Offline

Travis a.k.a TRAV



Black04SpecV wrote:
05SpecVnBlack wrote:
I agree with J, and I don't see what all the fuss is about. I think alot of ppl have alot of trouble because they screw with their car too much. So what the tune drifts a little. As long as you have a wideband and keep an eye on your afr's, there isn't any reason why you can't make adjustments yourself. I believe that resetting your ECU everyday or whatever is what is causing you problems. Your car shouldn't run PIG RICH with 0 corrections as long as your giving the ECU the opportunity to make changes on it's own. Like I said my corrections are at -5 ALL THE WAY ACROSS THE BOARD, and my car does not run extremely rich. I don't think another +5 amount of correction is gonna make that