







Neat article, I know I haven't seen it before: http://www.motivemag.com/pub/feature/ve … SE-R.shtml
I gotta agreed with the last line... the B13 SE-R was in a league of it's own... the newer SE-Rs (B15s included) are just one of many...

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline

ror



nice!i was just thinking about this the other day! lol what a kawinkadink

Online

Shane



This is so true. Its a shame that they cant make sentra's nowadays with a huge aftermarket support. Honda fits and Nissan Versas get more publicity and aftermarket suport. Its wierd???
Offline

Geoff


that was a good read and very true. it was the only true se-r

Online

Greg


I don't agree with the article at all and frankly, think it's crap... but, that's beside the point.
Refer here: http://myspecv.com/f/t163837-rules-conc … ction.html
ANY bashing that goes on and your post is gone.
Offline




cute02spec wrote:
Neat article, I know I haven't seen it before: http://www.motivemag.com/pub/feature/ve … SE-R.shtml
I gotta agreed with the last line... the B13 SE-R was in a league of it's own... the newer SE-Rs (B15s included) are just one of many...
I also agree...its common sense here, the SE-R is yesterday...the spec v is today...and the fact is the SE-R back in the 90s made a lot more noise among enthusiasts than the spec v does today...There was definitely more hype back in 2002 than there was or is with the B16 today...whether B15 or B16 price has everything to do with it...but I also feel the two generations differ by the overall consumer buying the car...
Its a given, if you are an enthusiast looking to make car purchase in this segment today...the GTI, Honda Civic Si, or Chevy Cobalt SS are all better selections regardless of price...they all have a better aftermarket and in the end you probably get closer to what your looking for in any of them for less money and hassle once you start to modify...

Offline

Evan


That was an entertaining read.
Offline

Jeff



WHERE THE HELL IS THIS ON THE B16?
"There's a strut-tower brace up front, and a V-shaped chassis brace across the rear seatbacks, eliminating the folding rear seat."
Offline

Brian


MajorMods wrote:
WHERE THE HELL IS THIS ON THE B16?
"There's a strut-tower brace up front, and a V-shaped chassis brace across the rear seatbacks, eliminating the folding rear seat."
You didn't get one either?!?!? wierd lol
That's what I wanted to know When I saw it. We need to go to Nissan and find where they put all of them.

Offline

Joseph


LittleRedMachine wrote:
I don't agree with the article at all and frankly, think it's crap... but, that's beside the point.
Refer here: http://myspecv.com/f/t163837-rules-conc … ction.html
ANY bashing that goes on and your post is gone.
Couldn't agree more. Who writes this crap?
Offline

Zach



urbanjacup wrote:
Its a given, if you are an enthusiast looking to make car purchase in this segment today...the GTI, Honda Civic Si, or Chevy Cobalt SS are all better selections regardless of price...they all have a better aftermarket and in the end you probably get closer to what your looking for in any of them for less money and hassle once you start to modify...
SI ftw!

Offline

Zach



AgileMJOLNIR wrote:
LittleRedMachine wrote:
I don't agree with the article at all and frankly, think it's crap... but, that's beside the point.
Refer here: http://myspecv.com/f/t163837-rules-conc … ction.html
ANY bashing that goes on and your post is gone.Couldn't agree more. Who writes this crap?
It's not a comparison of the b13 to the b16. It's a comparison of the b13 IN IT'S TIME and the b16 IN IT'S TIME.

Offline

Blake

eh, I agree with them to a point. Although the sr20 proved its worthy, I still feel a little fanboi vibe from the guy, If we (b15-b16 guys) had more exposere or aftermarket support I think we would have more fanbois too. Dont get me wrong I get a kick out of telling people I drive the 09 Altima hybrid who dont know any better, but at the same time I wish we had the hype of OMGROFLBBQ its a spec V!
Offline

Steven C.


ProZach626 wrote:
AgileMJOLNIR wrote:
LittleRedMachine wrote:
I don't agree with the article at all and frankly, think it's crap... but, that's beside the point.
Refer here: http://myspecv.com/f/t163837-rules-conc … ction.html
ANY bashing that goes on and your post is gone.Couldn't agree more. Who writes this crap?
It's not a comparison of the b13 to the b16. It's a comparison of the b13 IN IT'S TIME and the b16 IN IT'S TIME.
I couldn't beleive how bad off the b13 was in those pictures. Somebody needs to get beat for that. It was painful to look at. I agree though, the b13 was/is awesome for the time it was produced. I kinda laughed at the part where they talk about how people have snatched them up and turned them into racecars, too true. I see at least two b13 Se-Rs everytime I go to an autocross event. They really were the awesome sleeper though too. No really distinct rims or badging.

Online

Doug



they were right about the b13 SE-R most people who own them dont know what thier capable of.. back in highschool one kid had one and he had no clue what potential was under the hood. he just beat the shit out of it and treated it like a shitty beater. i wish i could gotten my hads on it before he wrecked it
people need to give the specv credit where it is due tho.. they are decently stong cars from the factory and yes they have thier flaws but what deosnt? our aftermarket support is growing, and we (here on this forum mostly) are working to make it a formidable player our segment, and exteding our peformance into others (evo and sti territory for example). from gurov and heidi pioneering the HQR, and everyone else pushing our platform to the limits and then figuring out how to get past whats holding them back and then finding the next limit. personally im glad i own a specv at this time of innovation cuz its so much fun to watch everyone work on different things and see how it all turns out. B13 was amazing in the 90's and the specv is awesome for its day in age.
yes i went on a rant but that shit happens when you do a wake and bake

1/4- 15.939 @ 88.65mph 

Offline








urbanjacup wrote:
cute02spec wrote:
Neat article, I know I haven't seen it before: http://www.motivemag.com/pub/feature/ve … SE-R.shtml
I gotta agreed with the last line... the B13 SE-R was in a league of it's own... the newer SE-Rs (B15s included) are just one of many...I also agree...its common sense here, the SE-R is yesterday...the spec v is today...and the fact is the SE-R back in the 90s made a lot more noise among enthusiasts than the spec v does today...There was definitely more hype back in 2002 than there was or is with the B16 today...whether B15 or B16 price has everything to do with it...but I also feel the two generations differ by the overall consumer buying the car...
Its a given, if you are an enthusiast looking to make car purchase in this segment today...the GTI, Honda Civic Si, or Chevy Cobalt SS are all better selections regardless of price...they all have a better aftermarket and in the end you probably get closer to what your looking for in any of them for less money and hassle once you start to modify...
The 2002 launch was VERY hyped and marketed... that's how I found out about the car was from that music/anime/info CD! The marketing was insane and very well done. I was kinda let down with the 2007 came out because I was expecting something similar (I collect Sentra advertising, heh)... but then again, I guess since there was already a Spec V, the hype wasn't going to be the same.
I didn't get nit picky with the fine details of the article (like holy shit, couldn't they have found a B13 with a little less rust? mine didn't have a drop on it when I sold it two years ago...). I just liked the general message. A person can't deny that a SE-R/Spec V is just a drop in the bucket nowadays among so many other "sport compacts." Back in the B13 era, the car was a leader, now we're the followers of other similar cars. I think some are missing this message...

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline








It made cardomain! First time I've seen them talk about a Spec V that... wasn't mine 
http://blog.cardomain.com/blog/2008/09/ … t-199.html

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline

John


I think the b16's r cute and the b15's pwn - this guy is a crack smokin' retard. Sure the b13's were nice (although I'm not sure why the F*** they bought that rusty terd-should be put out of its misery) but power to weight wise the b15's and b16's destroy it. The fact that newer sentras have usable back seats and a couple extra doors does not mean they down revive the spirit of the first SeR. I mean c'mon that is straight BS and for any of u who believe it I say this - GO GET IN YOUR V AND RAPE A CORNER RIGHT NOW!!! Then come back and see if u still have the spine to feed me this "not the real SeR" bullshit. Psshhhhh plz...
Everytime I drive my car I get that "I know something that u don't" feeling. The ONLY reason the V doesn't get the same respect as the Si (screw anybody who gives props to the crapiest underpowered/overpriced/blandly styled sports car EVA!) is that is was missing from the scene when the import bomb hit in the mid 90's. The b14 SeR?! Now THAT was where Nissan failed... many call the b15 the next tru 510 and I totally agree. That article was 100% grade-A bull plop. They wouldn't know an SeR from an asshole in my honest opinion. Anybody that would let a Nissan suffer in front of a camera like that should be run over with it! AND LOTS OF OTHER STUFF THAT ARTICLE MAKES ME WANT SAY!
taht iz all 4 now 
Last edited by SPECial Sauce (2008-09-24 14:37:16)

Offline

John


ps the only thing nice about a Si is the gas mileage - it iz teh gheynezz - k im done 4 now
Last edited by SPECial Sauce (2008-09-24 14:37:34)

Offline








Wow... people are really missing the point of this article... badly.

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline

Jeff



point:
b13 ser was far and few between
b14 failed
b15 the newer, better version
b16, nothing new, really, just remodeled
the Se-R name has lost its umph and respect since ALOT more owners have an Se-R spec-V vs. back in the day with the SER. Tell me how many B14 sentra SE or even b14 200sx SE-R u find... NOT MANY
Offline








jeff gets it at least...
"And in that sense — of running with the pack but not being out in front of it — the little Sentra has lost its magic. The Spec V is a better car than the 1991 model, but it's not a better SE-R. "
I don't see what's so insulting by that line... when it's the truth.

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline

Blake

cute02spec wrote:
urbanjacup wrote:
cute02spec wrote:
Neat article, I know I haven't seen it before: http://www.motivemag.com/pub/feature/ve … SE-R.shtml
I gotta agreed with the last line... the B13 SE-R was in a league of it's own... the newer SE-Rs (B15s included) are just one of many...I also agree...its common sense here, the SE-R is yesterday...the spec v is today...and the fact is the SE-R back in the 90s made a lot more noise among enthusiasts than the spec v does today...There was definitely more hype back in 2002 than there was or is with the B16 today...whether B15 or B16 price has everything to do with it...but I also feel the two generations differ by the overall consumer buying the car...
Its a given, if you are an enthusiast looking to make car purchase in this segment today...the GTI, Honda Civic Si, or Chevy Cobalt SS are all better selections regardless of price...they all have a better aftermarket and in the end you probably get closer to what your looking for in any of them for less money and hassle once you start to modify...The 2002 launch was VERY hyped and marketed... that's how I found out about the car was from that music/anime/info CD! The marketing was insane and very well done. I was kinda let down with the 2007 came out because I was expecting something similar (I collect Sentra advertising, heh)... but then again, I guess since there was already a Spec V, the hype wasn't going to be the same.
I didn't get nit picky with the fine details of the article (like holy shit, couldn't they have found a B13 with a little less rust? mine didn't have a drop on it when I sold it two years ago...). I just liked the general message. A person can't deny that a SE-R/Spec V is just a drop in the bucket nowadays among so many other "sport compacts." Back in the B13 era, the car was a leader, now we're the followers of other similar cars. I think some are missing this message...
The old Honda blood in me wants me to ask the question what can be done to a sr20 that cant be done to a d16 motor? I'm very familiar with the phrase " theres no replacement for displacement" meaning I kno the 2.0 is obviously better...but youtube 9 second D series honda.
Now to defend my new NIssan blood.....how could you call the spec a drop in the bucket? I could honestly say half the people who are into "imports" dont know anything about our cars. I've seen a couple introduction threads from people who are excited about there new V SPEC. Its not fair to catagorize our cars with the MS3 or cobalt SS or WRX. I think Nissan did a damn good job with the spec. It wasnt untill 07 that Honda finally caught up with the civic. 5-10 years from now our 200hp cars are going to be SLOW for imports stock. Just like the 140hp sr20 was the shit 15 years ago, I think the same will happen (not the same extent) with the qr25 down the road. People are going to realize and push our motor
Offline








It's a drop in the bucket because there's so many similar cars out nowadays that are like it... everybody puts out a "sport compact" now... That wasn't done in the early 90s. There's nothing making the Spec V a leader in teh sport compact world.. nothing. You say B13 SE-R, import people will know. Say something about a new(er) Spec V, and they're like "you drive a what?"

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline

Blake

the b15 ser - spec v difference is what? like 10HP (performance wise). Its different on the b16. I understand where Heidi is going, it seems like slowly but surely the SER is loosing all the jazz it had. I went to the local gathering a few months back with my buddy in his b15 SER and I hear some1 go "nah its not fast, its not a spec"
Offline








A Spec v IS an SE-R...
Still think the point is being missing...

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline

Blake

cute02spec wrote:
It's a drop in the bucket because there's so many similar cars out nowadays that are like it... everybody puts out a "sport compact" now... That wasn't done in the early 90s. There's nothing making the Spec V a leader in teh sport compact world.. nothing. You say B13 SE-R, import people will know. Say something about a new(er) Spec V, and they're like "you drive a what?"
there really not similiar though, We are pretty much par with the SI and RSX type S, but thats it. Its the way these other asshole companies like Toyota promote their rad slow ass shitty cars...Check out the new scion commercial or the corolla S commercial. I would consider those bucket cars....as in bucket of shit
Offline








Might be on par, but not a leader.... I would assume at least the new SIs have an aftermarket that's decent now. I am sure SIs are outselling Spec Vs, too.

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline

Blake

cute02spec wrote:
A Spec v IS an SE-R...
Still think the point is being missing...
I know a Spec is a SER the point I was trying to make is your right. Back 15 years ago if you saw SER you were proud. Now people only want specs, they dont care if its only a SER
Offline








naturalsk8ter17 wrote:
cute02spec wrote:
A Spec v IS an SE-R...
Still think the point is being missing...I know a Spec is a SER the point I was trying to make is your right. Back 15 years ago if you saw SER you were proud. Now people only want specs, they dont care if its only a SER
That has nothing to do with what this article was about....

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline

John


I am not missing the point, i get it... he iz wet in the pants and soft in the head for b13's... i don't blame him im thinking of buying one ($500 red se-r w/ NO RUST and just needs clutch:) ). It's just that sooo many knock the b15's STILL... and imho the b15s own all considering the price. No they're not killer fast - neither was the b13, they don't have slamin good looks - ahem (look at the b13 lines - remind u of anything?), everybody that owns one has a little techie nerd inside their inner closet - o wait he got that right. This guy in reminescing about his first high school prom date or sumthin' - of course she was younger, because HE was younger.
Now I've not driven a b16, and I've always thought it was a bit weird the way it resembles a b14 (and frankly from what i've heard the handling does too)... and the b15 resembles the b13 and hence the 510. THAT is why the BRE car iz hands down THE coolest sentra on the board heheh -
So no... I deffinately don't miss the point. Reminescing iz one thing - being retarded and insulting what is in my opinion THE best small car platform is another. The b13 was an accounting trick just like the b15, and quite frankly even @ 20k the b16 is a bargain compared to the $30k mugen stink eye - and I bet it would kill it (we'll never find out because any fanboi that buys that cash-barge is probably to much of a nerd to race. Long live the SeR!
And OMG! plz don't start comparing it to cars that cost twice as much... IT IS THE DAMN LEADER IN ITS PRICE RANGE AND I ACTUALLY SOLD FOR NISSAN WHEN I BOUGHT MINE - NOBODY AT THE DEALER EVEN KNEW WHAT THE F*** IT WAS THEY SURE DO NOW...
AAAAAAAAA..... *POP* MY HEAD SPLODES
Last edited by SPECial Sauce (2008-09-24 14:38:09)

Offline

Doug



cute02spec wrote:
Might be on par, but not a leader.... I would assume at least the new SIs have an aftermarket that's decent now. I am sure SIs are outselling Spec Vs, too.
i would like to keep it that way.. let everyone own an SI and be like WTF is a SpecV, makes it that much better when they ask you about it 
MajorMods wrote:
point:
b13 ser was far and few between
b14 failed
b15 the newer, better version
b16, nothing new, really, just remodeled
the Se-R name has lost its umph and respect since ALOT more owners have an Se-R spec-V vs. back in the day with the SER. Tell me how many B14 sentra SE or even b14 200sx SE-R u find... NOT MANY
theres an old guy who owns a 200SX ser in my town but i never knew enough about it to give consideration (probably your point), does that have the sr20 as well?
1/4- 15.939 @ 88.65mph 

Offline








I love my B15s, but I guess I won't sit here and say they're the best car ever... like a lot want to, apparently.

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline

Blake

cute02spec wrote:
Might be on par, but not a leader.... I would assume at least the new SIs have an aftermarket that's decent now. I am sure SIs are outselling Spec Vs, too.
Those cars sell themselves like it was stated a few posts earlier, back in the 90's when the scene exploded it was civic civic civic, creepy fact but in all the import movies you know the spec was only in 1 scene of a movie? F&F2 when theres like 300 imports flying past the cops. With that said, its up to people like You, Jeff, Gurov and Rako to self promote the Spec. Nobody makes parts for us because they dont think enough people drive our cars
Offline








I drive the car for myself... not to get other people to buy it. Sorry, but that's the truth...

Snailed and Built (in progress) http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2191509 Offline