Pages: 1
Topic closed

Abe

Just wondering if your 0-60 times match the ones on motortrend. They claim the spec v does it in 6.4 seconds so with intake and an exhaust what are your times ?
Offline

Gorilla Bear

F#$k motor trend because they say that the spec v 0 to 60 in 7.0 sec.
i know that i done 0-60 faster than 7 sec and im sure other has


Offline

Tim

SE-REN wrote:
Just wondering if your 0-60 times match the ones on motortrend. They claim the spec v does it in 6.4 seconds so with intake and an exhaust what are your times ?
I timed mine the other day: 0-60 mph = 6.47 seconds completely stock save for K&N in stock air box.
Offline

Jason


Offline

I had my friend Larry sit next to me and count. According to him, I did 0-60 in 4.27. Does that count?
Last edited by Zankoku (2008-07-29 12:52:39)
Offline

Abe

i did 7.4 ima stock SE-R no mods, spec v are for sure faster then Si's to 60 too. What RPM do you launch at ? 4000 ? wont you get too much wheel spin the spec v is a beast with torque.
Offline

MIGUEL


i have beeten my friends cobalt witch is 0 to 60 in 6.4 so i would like to say maybe 6.0 to 6.2 for me
Offline


I would Say 5.5 to 6.0 seconds
Offline

Sirl: thats your new Rap name.. Hyper D


With a belltronics meter, and an Autometer Dpic, i average 4.019 secs. Would be faster, bu the CVT has some off the line lag to it.


Offline

Brian


a b16 does not do 0-60 in 4 sec...not even close

Offline

Sirl: thats your new Rap name.. Hyper D


griebs18 wrote:
a b16 does not do 0-60 in 4 sec...not even close
LOL. I guess you havent seen this car yet?
Anyway. Moded right, you can. But if 2 different professional meters are wrong, even pushing 220+hp, oh well. B15's must be even slower.


Offline

Brian


i was talking about what the thread was stated at (exhuast and intake) people see 4 sec and it goes straight to there head that that must mean theres can do it in 4
i no what u have done to ur car and have been very impressed by it - no hard feelings from my previous post

Offline

Sirl: thats your new Rap name.. Hyper D


griebs18 wrote:
i was talking about what the thread was stated at (exhuast and intake) people see 4 sec and it goes straight to there head that that must mean theres can do it in 4
i no what u have done to ur car and have been very impressed by it - no hard feelings from my previous post
My apologies, i understand. Im hoping after the diet, and fixing the fuel/oil problem, I can hit the 4's more consistantly.


Offline

Kevin



I have Dynolicious on my iPod. I've done like, 8 sec, 7.9 sec and other high 7's.
#1. Worn out stocker tires (all seasons) = horrible 60' times. (like 3 and 2.8)
#2. I'm not a professional driver
#3. Could have calibrated it wrong
Either way, it's fun to play with.
Offline

Brian


dirtyV wrote:
I have Dynolicious on my iPod. I've done like, 8 sec, 7.9 sec and other high 7's.
#1. Worn out stocker tires (all seasons) = horrible 60' times. (like 3 and 2.8)
#2. I'm not a professional driver
#3. Could have calibrated it wrong
Either way, it's fun to play with.
wow...what is dynolicious???? tells u how fast and long it takes u to get to sped????

Offline

Brian


Djtorello wrote:
griebs18 wrote:
i was talking about what the thread was stated at (exhuast and intake) people see 4 sec and it goes straight to there head that that must mean theres can do it in 4
i no what u have done to ur car and have been very impressed by it - no hard feelings from my previous postMy apologies, i understand. Im hoping after the diet, and fixing the fuel/oil problem, I can hit the 4's more consistantly.
that would be beast

Offline

Kevin



Let me look at the past runs I've done.
I have the car set at 3150 lbs. with 16% drivetrain loss in the setup.
Typical results will look like this:
Acceleration:
0-10 - 1.20 sec
0-20 - 2.22 sec
0-30 - 3.22 sec
0-40 - 4.52 sec
0-50 - 6.06 sec
0-60 - 8.00 sec
Elapsed Time:
60' - 2.92 sec @ 25.8 mph
330' - 7.14 sec @ 54.7 mph
1/8 mi - 10.73 sec @ 62 mph
It will go up to 1/4 mile and keep track of data till then.
Oh and my final excuse is it's still hot in AZ 
Offline

Michael





Djtorello wrote:
griebs18 wrote:
a b16 does not do 0-60 in 4 sec...not even close
LOL. I guess you havent seen this car yet?
Anyway. Moded right, you can. But if 2 different professional meters are wrong, even pushing 220+hp, oh well. B15's must be even slower.
a 2002 Corvette Z06 will do 0-60 in 4seconds. its got 405hp with curb weights around the spec... Your telling me your 220 hp FWD sentra can match a corvette to 60...
Offline

Chris Sowa


Djtorello wrote:
griebs18 wrote:
a b16 does not do 0-60 in 4 sec...not even close
LOL. I guess you havent seen this car yet?
Anyway. Moded right, you can. But if 2 different professional meters are wrong, even pushing 220+hp, oh well. B15's must be even slower.
Yeah I'm gonna agree with Brian sry. Really don't see a 07 N/A Spec 0-60 @ 4 seconds. Even with 220 hp. Look up cars that have 4 second 0-60's...
I'm not trying to bash tho...just prove me wrong 
Just to give you a comparison a quick Google shows a 2005 Lamborghini Gallardo does 0-60 in 4.1 seconds.
Last edited by Redlinehax (2008-09-25 01:47:53)

Offline

Brian


Redlinehax wrote:
Djtorello wrote:
griebs18 wrote:
a b16 does not do 0-60 in 4 sec...not even close
LOL. I guess you havent seen this car yet?
Anyway. Moded right, you can. But if 2 different professional meters are wrong, even pushing 220+hp, oh well. B15's must be even slower.Yeah I'm gonna agree with Brian sry. Really don't see a 07 N/A Spec 0-60 @ 4 seconds. Even with 220 hp.
better agree with me...or ill fuck yo toof up...bitch

Offline

Chris Sowa


griebs18 wrote:
Redlinehax wrote:
Djtorello wrote:
LOL. I guess you havent seen this car yet?
Anyway. Moded right, you can. But if 2 different professional meters are wrong, even pushing 220+hp, oh well. B15's must be even slower.Yeah I'm gonna agree with Brian sry. Really don't see a 07 N/A Spec 0-60 @ 4 seconds. Even with 220 hp.
better agree with me...or ill fuck yo toof up...bitch
4 second territory is like murciellago, gallardo, proshe, gt mclaren f1, and gtr territory.... Not Spec V territory.

Offline

Brian


on a lighter note...my old cavalier did 0-60 in 8.8 seconds 
or was it 9.8...shit i dont remember
SLOW THATS ALL
Last edited by griebs18 (2008-09-25 01:51:08)

Offline

Greg


Nonsense gets deleted. You're forewarned now.
Offline

Greg


doock87 wrote:
my boner grows to 60 in 3.5 seconds
oops. how did i miss you?
Offline

Brian




Offline

Geoff


my grand vitara did 0-60 in 12+ seconds!

Online

faqdavid wrote:
F#$k motor trend because they say that the spec v 0 to 60 in 7.0 sec.
i know that i done 0-60 faster than 7 sec and im sure other has
Motor Trend has written 7 seconds for the Spec-V however in their test article (Spec-V vs Si), they made 0-60 in 6.4 seconds. Also, Edmund's Inside Line did 0-60 in 6.7. So the Spec-V stock is definately a 6 second car. Of course, there are many variables to consider when trying to match their times.
Offline

Abe

thats i think pretty much impossible to go 60 in 4 seconds flat with a Sentra SE-R we dont even have traction control if i was to gun it with that much power id sit there for 4 seconds.
Offline

Sirl: thats your new Rap name.. Hyper D


SE-REN wrote:
thats i think pretty much impossible to go 60 in 4 seconds flat with a Sentra SE-R we dont even have traction control if i was to gun it with that much power id sit there for 4 seconds.
How many launches have you done where you lost traction with your SE-R? Ive had none, till near the 190 hp range. The CVT puts power to the wheels to a point, too much power, it acts like it goes in Nuetral, to prevent lose of traction. You can do a burn out, and destoy your brakes if you push it. But normally, you get NO wheel spin. No lose of traction, No lost time on the launches.


Offline


Could you all post wich was you meters above sea level, that makes the difference.
Offline

Cameran

ok seriously no way in hell does a "bolted" b 16 SE-R run 4's not going to happen the only way i will believe that is if i see it on A REAL VIDEO
Offline

Abe

Djtorello wrote:
SE-REN wrote:
thats i think pretty much impossible to go 60 in 4 seconds flat with a Sentra SE-R we dont even have traction control if i was to gun it with that much power id sit there for 4 seconds.
How many launches have you done where you lost traction with your SE-R? Ive had none, till near the 190 hp range. The CVT puts power to the wheels to a point, too much power, it acts like it goes in Nuetral, to prevent lose of traction. You can do a burn out, and destoy your brakes if you push it. But normally, you get NO wheel spin. No lose of traction, No lost time on the launches.
well ive launched a couple times in different RPM ranges. At 2000 i get minimum wheel spin and get best 0-60times at 3000 i spin for about 2 seconds i think depending on the road. And im bone stock.
Offline

Sirl: thats your new Rap name.. Hyper D


DARK RICHARDHAUNTER wrote:
Could you all post wich was you meters above sea level, that makes the difference.
I live on an island, About 10ft above sea level.


Offline

Sirl: thats your new Rap name.. Hyper D


JSTASNTRA wrote:
ok seriously no way in hell does a "bolted" b 16 SE-R run 4's not going to happen the only way i will believe that is if i see it on A REAL VIDEO
Your thinking about this alittle outta wack? The biggest issue with overall speed is aerodynamics, the overcoming the force of air. Think about how you can change this.


Offline

Chris Sowa


Dude... If ur 0-60 is close to 5.5s Id be suprised. Aerodynamics and the ser dont belong in the same sentance.
Last edited by Redlinehax (2008-09-25 20:58:30)

Offline

Geoff


i'm surprised by my 6.5... i'd be surpised if you got below 6 seconds. i'm gonna call
on the 4 sec sentra.

Online

Chris Sowa


Look up the b16s drag coefficient compared to the gtr or honda insight...

Offline

Michael


lmao about 0-60 in 4 seconds in a B16... so your telling me nearly stock or whatever you have B16 is faster than an E46 M3 and just as fast as the new M5? And is almost hitting supercar peformance 0-60 times? Think about that for just a second...

Offline

Chris Sowa


ChampWhiteEG6 wrote:
lmao about 0-60 in 4 seconds in a B16... so your telling me nearly stock or whatever you have B16 is faster than an E46 M3 and just as fast as the new M5? And is almost hitting supercar peformance 0-60 times? Think about that for just a second...
Hi Mike! I wanna race ur eg when my car is done and see how i hold up! Whoop!

Offline

Michael


Redlinehax wrote:
ChampWhiteEG6 wrote:
lmao about 0-60 in 4 seconds in a B16... so your telling me nearly stock or whatever you have B16 is faster than an E46 M3 and just as fast as the new M5? And is almost hitting supercar peformance 0-60 times? Think about that for just a second...
Hi Mike! I wanna race ur eg when my car is done and see how i hold up! Whoop!
What up! For sure, but I gotta race preston too 

Offline

Chris Sowa


ChampWhiteEG6 wrote:
Redlinehax wrote:
ChampWhiteEG6 wrote:
lmao about 0-60 in 4 seconds in a B16... so your telling me nearly stock or whatever you have B16 is faster than an E46 M3 and just as fast as the new M5? And is almost hitting supercar peformance 0-60 times? Think about that for just a second...
Hi Mike! I wanna race ur eg when my car is done and see how i hold up! Whoop!
What up! For sure, but I gotta race preston too
Super! 

Offline

nick

ive done a few things to my none spec sentra not having to shift gears helps with tracktion but it would need 100 more hp , nos to get those 5 sec times .and that would be the end of the cvt it came with .

Offline

Michael

i got 0-60 in my ser in 6.9-7.152 secs with exhaust stillen lip n sports line....i was thinking bout getting it turbo u think the cvt can handle that? i dont see why not if the 3.5 cvt altima can do it, or if the new maxima cant get 290 in a n cvt
Offline


that wrong guys i take my spec v 08 stock and i did my 1/8 of mile @ 72mph in 8.8 sec
Offline



i am not posting this in hate.
but i find it COMPLETELY impossible for the spec v to even make it close to a 4 second 0-60.
i dont even know how the physics would work out how to make 212whp push a 3000lb+ car to 60mph on 4 seconds.
my boss's porsche boxster has a carerra swap and a full catless exhaust, its pushing well over 300hp to the wheels and he has yokohama advan neova's on it.
he cant even break 0-60 in 4.5 and his car is FAST, the new evo gsr does it in 5.0, and the mr in an average of 4.7.

Offline

Evan


I didn't wanna get into this post but I can't stand it anymore.
DJ has a supposedly fully built engine and all kinds of bs mods, but I've never seen any pictures, dyno's videos no proof other than he says it happened. Frankly it's bullshit IMHO anyone who made a BREAKTHROUGH like that would advertise it to the fullest extent and considering he hasn't done anything about it, other than a really fudged dyno graph that shows numbers that are obviously fake.
I can't stand fucking misinformation, so please from now on, don't post any wild claims without proof.
I'm not hating, I'm just saying don't say something so ludicrous and then not even back it up, it makes you look like a tool.
CVT's still havw traction issues by the way, I've driven the new maxima and had NO PROBLEM roasting its tires from a dead stop full throttle.
Good driver can do low 6's with a hard launch, average driver will see high 6's around a 7 flat with a spec v stock. SE-R's are a tad bit slower to 60 but moreso after 60.
Offline

Greg


Apologies to the original poster... but, I think it's best that this gets closed and forgotten about.
Offline
Topic closed
Pages: 1